STORM WATCH

Tracking possible plowable snow Sunday in New Jersey

New Jersey’s highest court finds ‘implicit or unconscious’ bias at play in jury selection

New Jersey’s highest court has tossed out a 2017 first-degree murder conviction after finding that the state may have relied on “implicit or unconscious” bias when it sought to remove a prospective Black juror.

News 12 Staff

Jul 14, 2021, 11:08 AM

Updated 1,283 days ago

Share:

New Jersey’s highest court has tossed out a 2017 first-degree murder conviction after finding that the state may have relied on “implicit or unconscious” bias when it sought to remove a prospective Black juror.
The decision Tuesday called for a new trial and a state conference on how juries are selected in New Jersey, a process based on law dating to the late 1800s.
In 2017, Edwin Andujar was convicted of first-degree murder after authorities accused him of stabbing his roommate 12 times with a knife.
During jury selection for Andujar’s trial, the state challenged a prospective juror, but the court rejected the challenge.
Prosecutors then checked the prospective juror's background and found a warrant and had him arrested. The court said bias may have played a role.
AP wire services helped contribute to this report.